|
Warwickshire Chess Association |
| News | WCA | FAQs | Calendar | Café | Roll of Honour | County Chess | Junior Chess | Congress | Clubs | Leagues | Links | Archives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Board | Greater Manchester | Grade | Score | Score | Grade | Warwickshire |
| 1 | Hulmes, David | 211 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 204 | Thomas, Nicholas |
| 2 | Beach, Richard | 197 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 197 | James, Russell A |
| 3 | Pickles, Steven | 196 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 199 | Hynes, AM (Tony) |
| 4 | Surtees, Mike | 194 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 191 | Baruch, Andrew JD |
| 5 | Reeve, Andy | 188 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 186 | Escott, Keith L |
| 6 | Zuther, Torsten | 185 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 178 | Ireland, David J |
| 7 | Murphy, James | 172 | 1 | 0 | 174 | Smyth, Martin D |
| 8 | Burke, Mitchell | 162 | 0 | 1 | 171 | Lloyd, Alan D |
| 9 | Vout, Tom | 178 | 1 | 0 | 172 | Wallman, Robert J |
| 10 | Tyton, Adam | 175 | 0 | 1 | 181 | Wildig, Robert H |
| 11 | Rita, Joao | 155 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 170 | Agnew, Alan |
| 12 | Webber, Aaron | e172 | 0 | 1 | 169 | Eckloff, Colin |
| 13 | Wei, James | 160 | 0 | 1 | 160 | Smith, Simon CA |
| 14 | Norris, Mick | 165 | 0 | 1 | 168 | Stewart, Joseph J |
| 15 | Lonsdale, Johnathan | 157 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 150 | Sadler, Anthony |
| 16 | Beresford, Alan | 159 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 156 | Goodwin, Ed H |
| Totals | 6.5 | 9.5 |
Home Venue: Midland Red Social Club, Quinton, Birmingham.
After last matches performance, there was little direction the team could have gone but up and they did just that. Unfortunately, two of the top players dropped out on the day, meaning that I not only had to shuffle everyone up boards but also default a game too so things stated out very much in our opponents favour and as I was very distracted today I will not be able to provide my usual game analysis but a summary of how the match proceeded.
Colin Eckloff was the first to win, with a fairly crushing mating attack from a ruy lopez game, thus overcoming the first obstacle of our default point and putting us level again. Keith Escott followed soon after when it appeared that his opponents french defence was too solid to hold against, even with the good knight vs. bad bishop. Soon after Andy Baruch, who had been dominating his opponent right from the early stages, forced a resignation. Pablo, who also had been in great command of his alekhine position from the early stages, effortlessly converted what appeared to be a tricky rook endgame with two isolated pawns and won us another full point. At this stage, things looked promising but the top boards were still very double edged and the bottom boards were fairly level so there was still plenty of work to be done.
Play through the games of Colin Eckloff and Pablo Padillo in the Analysis Room of the Cafe.
A while later it was reported that Tony and Phil had both won in quick succession on boards 1 and 2 - Tony playing a more patient c3 Sicillian game and eventually his extra space was rewarded by the decimation of his opponents queenside and a nice solid win, Phil’s game as one of the most interesting of the match, as it appeared as though his young opponent had a fierce looking initiative building and it would be difficult to defend, but defend he did and the attack came to nothing but lost material and two more wins for us. Around this point, our winning series was brought to an end as Stewarts opponent had managed to come crashing through the defences with a series of tactical manoeuvres and his massive extra pawns reserves proved to be too much for black to maintain and we were dealt our first loss of the match. Alan Lloyds had looked quite good earlier, in one of his classical English games, but his opponent proved to be extremely resilient and was able to scrape a draw (on another note - it was Alan’s birthday today - and I am sure everyone sends their best wishes). However, our other Alan was not to be denied and converted a patient modern opening through the perils of the middlegame into a winning ending, flawlessly.
Next to finish was my own game which, I thought at the time was somewhat of a lacklustre result as I was sure there had been better opportunities available earlier on, actually was quite a favourable one for me as subsequent computer analysis showed my opponent to have a far superior position then originally assessed and so the draw agreement was the right decision. Bob Wildig had been steadily converting a huge endgame advantage with his superior knight and finished the job quite soon after, to put us well past the victory line and it was now just a case of trying to extract as many additional points as possible to help our progress in the group stages. Iain Gallowys game had looked pretty steady for a long time and he was able to hold a comfortable draw in the end, however Dons game had been a major struggle with the white pieces as an attacking opening had gone awry and he was now having to defend a tricky bishops endgame to avoid a loss - fortunately the position favoured Don, as the extra pawn of his opponents was on the wrong square h file for the bishop and so he was able to draw by tactical means of threatening to sacrifice his piece for the penultimate black pawn. This left the bottom boards to finish and martin smyth was the first to do so, having entered into a difficult looking queen endgame which looked to have some life left until his opponent blundered and allowed the queens to be traded and an easily won pawn ending was swiftly converted for another win. Tony Sadler was the last to finish and pressed hard with his extra bishop, gained after surviving some unpleasant threats earlier on, but the opposing threats of winning the endgame were too great and eventually it seemed better to trade off for a safe draw then risk undue complications.
All in all a fine performance and with a win against Manchester next month we will be back on course to take a swipe at the National Championship again.
Board Colours: Warwickshire played White on Odd board numbers, while Derbyshire had White on Even boards.
Board
Warwickshire
Grade
Score
Score
Grade
Derbyshire
1
Hynes, AM (Tony)
199
1
0
196
Raymond Evans
2
Holt, Philip J
200
1
0
189
Kishan Lakhani
3
Mason, Donald J
196
0.5
0.5
171
Simon Gilmore
4
Galloway, Iain A
190
0.5
0.5
165
Martin Howard
5
Baruch, Andrew JD
191
1
0
167
Raymond Gamble
6
Padilla, Pablo
184
1
0
168
Trevor Bould
7
Escott, Keith L
186
0.5
0.5
158
Derek Jarvis
8
Fishburne, Stewart K
184
0
1
e170
David Gothard
9
Lloyd, Alan D
171
0.5
0.5
163
Alan Downham
10
Agnew, Alan
170
1
0
145
Paul Sansom
11
Smyth, Martin D
174
1
0
144
Maurice Hill
12
Wildig, Robert H
181
1
0
136
Paul Kelman
13
Eckloff, Colin
169
1
0
139
David Pickering
14
Stewart, Joseph J
168
0.5
0.5
142
David Hoddy
15
Sadler, Anthony
150
0.5
0.5
138
Luke Alldread
16
Default
0
1
135
Nathan Atkins
Totals
11
5
Away Venue: Bushbury, Wolverhampton.
Well, what can I say except whoops! Although the results have been very convincing wins in the last two years Staffordshire today showed that they are not a side to be underestimated and gave us a bit of a good kicking for our complacency - luckily our newest addition to the squad (Alan Agnew) managed to rescue some scraps of dignity for the team by being the only one to score a full point. The board by board report will probably reveal that, in fact, the match may well have been much closer if it had not been for the collapse of several boards around the time trouble of the fourth hour. Next match will not be until the New Year so I will take this opportunity to wish everyone a happy (early) Christmas and let’s hope that the New Year brings us the success that we deserve.
Board 1: Nick Thomas vs Lawrence Cooper
Nick
seemed doubtful of my curse of the black pieces going into this
match but, sure enough, it struck again and he was gifted with the
white pieces (my board being an even number) and set about one of
his usual Giuoco Piano games, with an ambitious concession of the
bishop pair to compromise blacks pawn structure. In the end,
however, a draw was agreed fairly early into the match before black
had got a chance to activate his pieces.
Board 2: Tony Hynes vs Paul Wallace
White opened
with a Ruy Lopez, only to have nice peaceful positional squeeze
disrupted by Tony’s Schliemann counter attack (which can be most
off-putting when you are a more steady type of player). This did not
deter Mr Wallace from his ambitions to keep things sensible and he
forced an exchange of queens vie a cunning check on e6, the bishop
on d7 powerless to make a capture due to a pin, and after this the
resultant endgame seemed to just be that much better for white for
the duration of the match - Tony tried hard to stir up some
complications but eventually whites active rooks, coupled with a
nasty looking passed pawn, were enough to force a
resignation.
Board 3: Phil Holt vs Darren Wheeler
Phil put in
a good performance in trying to prevent Wheelers drawish tendencies
from becoming a reality and went down one of the main lines of the
French Tarrasch theory, maintaining pressure against black’s
backwards e-pawn and trying to build up pressure against the
relatively undefended kingside. Black decided that this was going to
be a good time for some counterplay and made some attacking moves
with his bishop on the f file but ultimately the players decided to
settle on a peaceful solution to their problems and a draw was
agreed.
Board 4: Don Mason vs David Anderton
After the
last match Don was sure that he would face an improvement on his
previous winning line and chose to emulate the great Garry Kasparov
and played one of the lines which brought him success in his recent
games against Karpov. As it turned out, David had also followed
these matches and had even come up with an improvement on Karpov’s
play which helped to get him quite a nice looking...
Board 5: Iain Galloway vs Nick Walker
Iain opened
up with his English/Sicilian hybrid system which was met with fairly
active pawn play by his opponent who refused to allow white to gain
much of a permanent blockade established. This meant that after the
white centre was reformed, the position had become a little unstable
and a draw was agreed.
Board 6: Pablo Padilla vs Alan Crombleholme
This
game featured the fairly rare Englund gambit, as played by
Pablo. White seemed to be fairly well versed in the tricky
ways of this system and managed to hold the pawn stubbornly, despite
ending up with some fairly messy looking doubled ones of his own.
The pawn advantage proved not to be sufficient to achieve a win for
white and the game was decreed to be a draw.
Board 7: Dani Malik vs Alex Richardson
Dani
attempted to spice up the, usually dull, Caro Kahn opening with the
fantasy variation - a dangerous system full of traps and
tactics. Black had to work quite hard to avoid the worst of
the attack and even netted himself a pawn for some time but the
active white bishops were able to overcome the slow cumbersome
knights to keep Richardson from being able to convert this advantage
and a draw was the eventual result.
Board 8: Mark Page vs Craig Whitfield
One of the
most exciting games of the day, Marks attacking Najdorf was the
first to find a target down the b file - right where white’s king
was sitting. Although the game looked clearly better for black for
almost the entire playing session, whites tenacious defences kept
him safe consistently and, just when it appeared he had spent too
much time defending and would not have the seconds left on the clock
to make the time control it was actually Marks flag which fell first
and
a potential win was turned into a loss for us.
Board 9: Kaiser Malik vs Lee Grinsell
Kaiser
tried to gain an advantage against his opponents Sicilian by playing
a c3 system and getting a pretty good looking pawn centre.
Black, not feeling in the mood for much of a battle, chose the safe
option of blocking the position up and making it almost impossible
to make any worthwhile progress and so another draw was
agreed.
Board 10: Stewart Fishburne vs John
Turner
Stewart played a modern defence and, although the game was
never in any great danger of looking like a loss, whites play seemed
to be far more geared towards steering things into drawish
territories then trying to win and ultimately he got what he wanted
as another draw was agreed.
Board 11: Bob Wildig vs David Cooper
Bobs queens
gambit opening worked out pretty well, especially after blacks
attempts to undermine the pawn centre left him with doubled kingside
pawns and bob was effectively a pawn up with a nice comfortable
looking game. Things took a turn for the worst when the exchange of
a rook for bishop was forced (possibly it may have been a deliberate
thing, as I was not looking at the exact time it happened) but by
this time whites king had penetrated blacks pawn structure and
things started to look very favourable. Sadly, the pawn advantage
was not quite as telling as it could have been as Bob ended up
losing his bishop in a bit of time trouble and the passed pawns,
strong as they were, were not quite far enough advanced to force
through for a win and were duly rounded up, leading to another
potential full point lost.
Board 12: Alan Lloyd vs Patrick Bennett
Things
looked ominous here, even before the game had started, when Alan
told me he had a fairly bad record against this particular opponent
and then ending up with the black pieces against an English only
made things harder. Things did not look quite so bad in the opening
stages, and the black counterplay on the queenside appeared to be
getting the better position. Somewhere along the way, unfortunately
I missed the exciting bit here as well, white sacrificed the
exchange for some very powerful passed pawns and actively placed
pieces and, try as he might, Alan was just not able to cause any
major problems from then on and eventually had to resign as the
queen and bishop set themselves up a mating net.
Board 13: Martin Smyth vs John Mangwengwende
The
game here went down a more closed route, as black’s Kings Indian
attempts to free up the kingside for f5 were squashed out and the
whole kingside was gridlocked by pawns. While attempting to prepare
for a sacrifice, Martin wandered his king into the centre away from
the coming melee but this proved to be a big mistake as black
managed to crack the d file open and his powerful looking bishops
checked the king right back into submission, black even refusing to
win an exchange of bishop for rook in favour of maintaining the
strong initiative. This attacking play was rewarded in the minutes
before time control as a natural looking defensive move, in fact,
allowed a mate in one which was duly taken.
Board 14: Alan Agnew vs John Keaveney
Alan’s
modern defence proved to be quite superior to the attacks his
opponent could muster and the position soon reached that resembling
a Sicilian. The exchanges of pieces seemed to be fairly favourable
to black and he was eventually able to reach an ending where, due to
whites doubled pawns on the e file, he was effectively a passed pawn
up and in the ensuing rook and queen endgame it made quite a
nuisance of itself, so much so that white had to swap off rooks and
continue to play a pawn down. As blacks queen was better placed, and
the passed pawn not yet dealt with, a strong attack loomed which
white decided was too much to handle and resigned (although,
subsequent analysis showed that it might have perhaps been possible
to have escaped with a draw).
Board 15: Colin Eckloff vs David
Pritchard
Colin’s c3 Sicilian was met with aggressive counterplay
by black, in the form of an early e5 pawn push. This attacking play
did come at a price, and blacks pieces ended up somewhat haphazardly
placed, with the potential of an 'accident' looming. At one point it
appeared that Colin had managed to snare himself one of those loose
pieces but due to some resourceful play by black he was only able to
win a pawn and trade off into a bishop + rook vs.. knight+ rook
endgame which may have been winnable had it not been for the fact
that white was desperately short of time and a long way from the
time control so ended up having to return the pawn in order to reach
equality and draw the game.
Board 16: Joey Stewart vs John Staniforth
My
opponent informed me that he has won all his games against
Warwickshire in the previous year’s play so I felt obliged to put a
stop to that, even if it meant holding him to a draw. As it
happened, the opening went down a relatively untrodden route (for
myself) as I was keen not to allow too much of an early attack so
played a little too safely. After some advances on the queenside, it
did start to look as though the tables might be about to turn and a
win was in the pipeline but in the end I just couldn’t find a move
which created sufficient threats that he could not prevent them all
in any given turn, and the 'advantage' slipped away until I had to
play for a draw to avoid getting squeezed out of a cramped
position.
Board Colours: Staffordshire played White on Odd board numbers, while Warwickshire had White on Even boards.
|
Board |
Staffordshire |
Grade |
Score |
Score |
Grade |
Warwickshire |
|
1 |
Lawrence Cooper |
209 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
204 |
|
|
2 |
Paul Wallace |
198 |
1 |
0 |
199 |
|
|
3 |
Darren Wheeler |
198 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
200 |
|
|
4 |
David Anderton |
192 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
196 |
|
|
5 |
Nicholas Walker |
189 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
190 |
|
|
6 |
Alan Crombelholme |
186 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
184 |
|
|
7 |
Alex Richardson |
185 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
188 |
|
|
8 |
Craig Whitfield |
185 |
1 |
0 |
180 |
|
|
9 |
Lee Grinsell |
183 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
180 |
|
|
10 |
John Turner |
175 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
184 |
|
|
11 |
David Cooper |
175 |
1 |
0 |
181 |
|
|
12 |
Patrick Bennett |
174 |
1 |
0 |
173 |
|
|
13 |
John Mangwengwende |
173 |
1 |
0 |
174 |
|
|
14 |
John Keaveney |
165 |
0 |
1 |
170 |
|
|
15 |
David Pritchard |
163 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
169 |
|
|
16 |
John Staniforth |
157 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
168 |
|
|
Totals |
|
|
10 |
6 |
|
|
About | Sitemap | Contact the
Webmaster
Copyright © Colin Reed
2009-2011. All rights
reserved.